Quote:
Originally Posted by E. Harry Denis,
Are you sure you are not pulling my chain? You are saying that the line will cut completely through the ice but the ice will freeze again behind the line so as to not be cut into two seperate pieces----right? Doesn't the rate that the line cuts through the ice, the weight on the line, make a difference? I am going to have to try this. |
.
Would not pull your leg, Emory.
The weight on the line only determines how quickly the line passes thru the iceblock.
The following gets a bit esoteric, but here goes..........hopefully its worth the read.
This was one of the first things as a youngster that enraptured me to the wonders of physics.
A TV show based on basic & quirky physical experiments with the punchline
"Why Does It Do THAT", A Professor Sumner Miller the moderator, demonstrated this 'string on ice black example' in the early days of TV..............yeah , I know , dates me doesn't it.........
the show contents stuck with me and taught me a very valuable lesson to think laterally about ALL potential parameters in physical events as the result of interactions vary with surrounding influences.........AND there is usually more than one parameter or dynamic at play.
.........leads to flawed intuitive assumptions when you don't consider the full context of the event that you are critiquing.
In about the 1980's at MIT a then engineering lecturer there , Crispin Mount Miller published a thesis examining the thinking patterns of engineering students posed questions of Finite Element Analysis of engineering models of a variety of situations. The report examined why students got the wrong answers.
This published Report again highlighted the need to consider context in analysing all elements of a given situation and that intuitive thinking often leads to flawed assumptions when context and all active parameters are not adequately evaluated.
FEA is all about teasing out the
real actions of multiple parameters at play in a dynamic situation, and experimental design to achieve that "teasing" is often difficult and flawed assumptions are made as a result of shortcuts or simply not doing the work to identify the significance of the parameter in the whole dynamic.
The link to rodbuilding in this is that a number of myths exist about certain aspects of rod building which are based in long held flawed intuitive thinking as a result of inadequate experimental design in determining the
real action and significance of a number of parameters in the dynamic of a rod in "on water" use.
The key dynamic in the 'string on the iceblock' situation is
pressure.........it depresses the freezing point of the water, but not its actual temperature, so as soon as the pressure is relieved the water refreezes.
Try it............I have no fear of the result that will be observed........it will be as stated...............I don't joke about physical dynamics.
A practical example of this is product stored in a freezer room.
- stack the boxes on top of each other too high and the pressure on the lower boxes increases to the point where the product softens and crushes.
- The 400T freezer storage room of the company I am a Director of, was designed without racking . I cautioned about 'pressure thawing' but was over-ruled in order to try to save money. When the 1 ton pallets reached 4 high ..........they came in the next morning to find busted pallets scattered all over the place & 27 Ton of product had to be dumped............then racking was installed.........no more problem..........lesson learnt, but only after a substantial financial loss.