"I just think we need to crack the code to getting them to bite. A lot of guys think it will be a daytime deep drop tactic and a lot of guys think it's nighttime trolling."
"I'm not sure, but I do know we have a lot of big swords here and they have to be eating a lot to get to that size. We just need to figure out how to get a bait in front of them when they are HUNGRY."
"Someone will crack the code here sooner or later. It's just a matter of time."
Here's your code (posted several times here before):
8-day PSAT track of a SoCal sword from several years ago. In subsequent discussions with Dr. Chugey Sepulveda, the above pattern has been the same for all the fish they've tagged in SoCal. What does the chart tell you?
* Look at the lower chart of the light levels. Other than two upward spikes, it's relatively constant around the 90 level. This reflects both day and night activity, so you could conclude that the swordfish prefers a relatively constant level of light.
* Look at the upper chart of the depth levels. It's a fairly consistent up and down pattern of movement. On the top end the fish is in the upper 25 to 30 meters of the water column; on the bottom end the fish is down at 250 to 400 meters.
* Regardless of depth, the recorded light level stayed the same. One could concluded the fish adjusted its depth to stay in the preferred level of light.
* Note that there are two instances where the light level spiked upwards significantly. Note that these upward spikes in the light level coincided with brief upward spikes in the depth all the way to the surface. One could conclude that these were daytime surfacing events.
* Over the 8-day track, the fish was on the surface twice. If I were playing the odds to increase my chances of success on a SoCal sword, knowing that few swordfish on the surface eat a presented bait and that a very small percentage of the time they are on the surface during the daytime, I would not focus on baiting daytime swords.
* Your best odds would be trolling at night and second would be deep dropping during the day. Trolling at night offers the best odds because you to cover more water area while staying in the sword zone. Unlike the South East Coast of Florida, we in SoCal do not have a Gulf Stream to drift in and cover water area at 3 to 5 knots. You could drift shallow baits at night off SoCal, but you'd be hoping for a fish to swim to you and eat. The other problem is that our waters are infested with small makos and blue sharks and they will get to your bait first. Proper trolling methods can reduce the interaction with sharks while keeping your offering in the sword zone and covering more water area.
* Deep dropping could work off SoCal. It would eliminate the makos and blue sharks as they do not normally dive down to 300 or 400 meters. I rate it second in odds of success because you'd cover no area. You're hoping the fish swims to you and eats.
* I know some guys got a bigeye thresher last year deep dropping to 800' during the day on Avalon Bank. A couple years ago we got a bigeye thresher trolling at night at 65' on the downrigger at the 277 which we had fished during the day for marlin. During the day the 277 was infested with makos of which we got two on the marlin jigs at 7 knots. Returned at night and got the bigeye within 30 minutes of trolling. No makos though. Tagging studies have shown the SoCal makos to hang in the top 12 meters at night; swordfish in the top 25 to 30 meters, thus my depth choice.
These are just my conclusions. I've put in about 8 or 9 nights so far over the course of about 7 years, so it could hardly be called a concerted effort. I believe that I have it dialed in as to depth at night, just need to put in more time. I will also try the higher speed surface trolling with the transformers on the assumption that I can avoid the makos while still putting my offerings in the sword zones. It's hard to convince people to go as most want to jack on easy fish such as albacore and dodos. I've been there and done that.